🔗 Share this article ‘It’s deeply saddening’: how thirty confined white whales have become pawns in dispute over animal cruelty. Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a large but guardian-like friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature. A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and advocacy groups. But those working directly with the whales say the heated discussion over their future often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who interact with them daily. After the Canadian government disallowed the sale of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance. Intelligent Sea Creatures Scientists say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and communal behavior indicate they are highly cognitive mammals – something Kristy Burgess learned directly. She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a position that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals. “Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.” Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing personalities. “One whale accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “They changed the way I understand bonding.” Public Concerns and Facility Decline Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement. During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, died. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park attributes to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept. The facility did not open to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.” The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality veterinary services and constant attention than any person in the Britain, or other places.” Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park believed details of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was let go not long after. The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any plans to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and specialized tools. “It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said. She backs calls for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff. In recent months, Canada’s government official turned down a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location. “To approve the application would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.” But Burgess said the minister’s comments indicate a broader lack of awareness of the realities of living conditions for belugas born in captivity. “The society needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.” Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate As authorities work to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities. A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The planned location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales. But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ future. Others say the possibility of a refuge represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the coming months. Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the location will simulate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|